Sleeping Ban Near Schools, Parks, Underpasses?

Proposal that would ban homelessness in many public areas sparks debate 

By Sam Catanzaro

A policy proposed by a Los Angeles City Councilmember that would prohibit sleeping within 500 feet of schools – among other locations – tests a federal court’s power over local governments’ attempt to tackle a homelessness crisis, while also raising moral questions. 

A federal court ruling last year in the case Martin v. City of Boise barred cities from punishing individuals from sleeping on public property unless they provide sufficient and accessible indoor housing.

“As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property,” reads the ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which includes both Idaho and California. 

In the decision, which ruled a City of Boise law penalizing homelessness unconstitutional, citing the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment, the court did give cities leeway to prohibit sleeping in public in certain situations. 

“Even where shelter is unavailable, an ordinance prohibiting sitting, lying, or sleeping outside at particular times or in particular locations might well be constitutionally permissible,” the decision reads. 

Last week, Los Angeles Councilman Mitch O’Farrell proposed a set of regulations that would test the scope of this leeway. The rules would prohibit sitting, lying down or sleeping within 500 feet of schools, daycare centers and parks while also banning bedding near homeless shelters. 

In addition, O’Farrell’s rules would make illegal: sleeping on bicycle paths; on bridges or in tunnels designated as school routes; public spaces with notices prohibiting trespassing; crowded areas near large venues exempt from the City’s street vending protection ordinance which includes areas such as the Venice Beach Boardwalk.  

The rules also would make illegal approaching, following closely or speaking to a person in a manner that may cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm or damage to or loss of property. Being intimidated into giving money would also be punishable as well. 

While supported by some residents such as Travis Binen who said in a letter to Council “the City needs to be able to legally move them instead of leaving them on the sidewalk to die or harm others,” O’Farrel’s proposal rebuked by his colleague Councilmember Mike Bonin in a series of tweets. 

“Some restrictions on encampments near schools and shelters make sense and could pass legal muster — but this overreaching proposal is giving a middle finger to the court, false promises to neighbors, and a kick in the head to people who are homeless,” Bonin wrote. “The heart of LA’s homeless problem is that that for decades we have focused on criminalization instead of solutions…Every time we criminalize, homelessness gets worse and the court ties the city’s hands further. And we squander resources and lose a mission-driven focus.

Lisa Redmond, a Westside resident, raised a moral objection to O’Farrell’s proposal saying “this is not how we should treat our neighbors and community members by punishing them for being less fortunate. It is plain and simple an act to criminalize individuals for being homeless,” in a letter to Council. 

In his series of tweets, while Bonin referenced that certain aspects of O’Farrell’s proposal could hold up legally, Gary Blasi, an emeritus law professor at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) said in an interview with the Los Angeles Times that how the proposed rules are implemented would determine their chance of surviving a legal battle. Specifically, Blasi noted that whether an individual experiencing homelessness had a practical way of knowing where they can legally sleep and whether the restrictions leave sufficient room on sidewalks for them to do so legally would be factors that the Supreme Court would consider.

Hanging over the legal prospects of O’Farrell’s proposal is the Supreme Court of the United States. On August 22 the City of Boise filed a petition in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Martin v. City of Boise, formally asking the Supreme Court to consider the case.

“If the 9th Circuit’s ruling is allowed to stand then cities will not have the tools they need to prevent a humanitarian crisis on their own streets. We hope the Supreme Court takes this case to restore the power of local communities to regulate the use of their streets, parks, and other public areas,” said Mayor Boise Dave Bieter.

in News
Related Posts

String of Car Break-Ins: Palisades Weekly Update

September 2, 2019

September 2, 2019

Burglary 100 Mabery Road, 8/26/19 at 9 PM. A 25 year old male was arrested for burglary after entering victim’s...

Palisades News TGIF Show August 30

August 31, 2019

August 31, 2019

Palisades News TGIF Show August 30 – all your local events and happenings in under 5 minutes*Palisades Women’s Club evening...

Brush Fire Breaks Out in Malibu

August 30, 2019

August 30, 2019

Sweetwater Fire erupts near Surfrider Beach By Sam Catanzaro Over 200 firefighters have made quick work containing a 40-acre brush...

Man Brandishes Knife, Spear Gun Stolen Car: Palisades Weekly Crime Update

August 27, 2019

August 27, 2019

Submitted by LAPD Lead Officer Michael Moore Stolen Vehicle 1200 Rimmer Avenue, between 8/19/19 at 10 PM and 8/20/19 at...

Saving Mountain Lions With World’s Largest Wildlife Crossing, Emergency Cell Service for Mandeville Canyon: Palisades News Today August 26

August 26, 2019

August 26, 2019

Palisades News Today August 26, 2019 – all your local news in under 5 minutes. * Saving mountain lions with world’s...

Great White Shark Breachings at Popular Palisades Surf Spot

August 26, 2019

August 26, 2019

Juvenile great white sharks in Santa Monica Bay By Keldine Hull While shark attacks in California are rare, breachings, particularly...

E-Scooters Not as Green as They Seem?

August 23, 2019

August 23, 2019

Recent study complicates understanding of e-scooters’ environmental impact. By Kai McNamee After taking Santa Monica and Los Angeles by storm,...

World’s Largest Wildlife Crossing Slated for SM Mountains

August 22, 2019

August 22, 2019

$87 million project aimed at saving mountain lions By Keldine Hull  An $87 million wildlife crossing, mostly funded by private...

Edify TV: Coral Trees and Gophers

August 21, 2019

August 21, 2019

Brentwood’s coral trees are in trouble and gophers may be to blame. Learn more about the uncertain future of these...

Monitoring Key Indicators for Fire Threat in the Santa Monica Mountains

August 20, 2019

August 20, 2019

City of Malibu Monitoring Key Indicators for Fire Threat in the Santa Monica Mountains By Staff Writer As part of...

Palisades Highlands Brush Fire, Sharks Sightings at Palisades Surf Spot: Palisades News This Week August 19

August 19, 2019

August 19, 2019

Palisades News This Week August 19 • LAFD makes quick work of Palisades Highlands fire • Sharks sightings at Palisades surf spotShow...

Coastal Commission Issues Cease and Desist to Developer who Bulldozed Ecologically–Sensitive Dunes

August 19, 2019

August 19, 2019

Ecologically–sensitive dunes graded by Legado Companies By Sam Catanzaro The California Coastal Commission (CCC) is taking swift and forceful action after...

‘On’ the Market Versus ‘In’ the Market

August 17, 2019

August 17, 2019

By Michael Edlen, Real Estate Consultant I have recently been asked about the increase in open houses and whether this is...

Comments
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *